Wireless mesh network planning: A multi-objective optimization approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A modern wireless network can be neither successfully deployed nor successfully expanded without proper planning. In this paper we consider the wireless mesh network (WMN) planning problem where not much work has been done. We propose a more realistic multi-objective approach to model this problem where the two conflicting objectives of total deployment cost and network throughput are to be optimized while guaranteeing full coverage to all mesh clients. Previous contributions have mainly formulated and solved this problem by using single-objective integer linear programming formulations and exact methods. The main limitation of these approaches resides in their restriction to small sized instances. We propose a population-based meta-heuristic algorithm to solve the problem. This algorithm produces a set of good planning solutions for real-size networks thus enlarging the decision perspective of a network planner. We also discuss the effect of different parameters on the characteristics of the solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it