Multigeneration assessment of nonylphenol and endosulfan using a model Australian freshwater fish, <i>Melanotaenia fluviatilis</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes over two generations in offspring and reproductive ability were recorded in crimson-spotted rainbowfish (Melanotaenia fluviatilis), a model Australasian freshwater fish, following a 24 h exposure to nominal nonylphenol concentrations of 50, 100, 500, 1000, 2250, and 5000 microg/L and following a 4 h exposure to nominal endosulfan concentrations of 1.0, 5.0, 10, 22, 33, and 50 microg/L. There were also four replicated control treatments: control 1 and 2 and solvent control 1 and 2, as well as "positive" female and male controls: 1 microg/L estradiol 1 and 2 and 1 microg/L testosterone 1 and 2. Results suggested that there may be some parental transfer of toxicants to embryos even over this short exposure period. Fertility of M. fluviatilis was reduced by a 24 h pulse exposure of adults to 100 microg/L nonylphenol and a 4 h exposure to 1.0 microg/L endosulfan. Hatch rates were significantly reduced after exposure to nonylphenol, endosulfan, and estradiol control but not in solvent controls and testosterone control. Significant correlations were found between reproductive and physiological parameters for nonylphenol and endosulfan exposed F0 adult rainbowfish. The major reproductive effects were on hatchability of the F1 generation and the gonadosomatic indices of male F1. The respective nominal NOEC and LOEC's for nonylphenol were 50 and 100 microg/L, and for endosulfan were <1.0 and 1 microg/L. These observed effects have the potential to significantly impact exposed rainbowfish populations through the observed approximately 45% reduction of hatchability and thus larval production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it