Reduction of Hydrogen Peroxide by Glutathione Peroxidase Mimics: Reaction Mechanism and Energetics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction mechanism for the reduction of hydrogen peroxide by N,N-dimethylbenzylamine diselenide, its selenol analogue, and the charged analogues of the diselenide and selenol are elucidated using reliable electronic structure techniques. It is found that the reaction using the diselenide has a large Gibbs energy barrier of 173.5 kJ/mol. The cationic diselenide, with both amines protonated, shows a lower barrier of 103.5 kJ/mol. Both diselenide species show significant Se-Se bond lengthening upon oxidation. An unusual two-step mechanism is found for the selenol with barriers of 136.3 and 141.9 kJ/mol, respectively, showing that it is unlikely that the selenol is the active form. The zwitterion, selenolate, and protonated amine analogues of the selenol show one-step reactions with energy barriers of 82.7, 92.7, and 102.3 kJ/mol, respectively. The zwitterion of the selenol shows the most favorable reaction energies, which is in good agreement with proposed mechanisms for this reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".