MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086073390 · doi:10.1080/03632415.2011.616459

NSERC's HydroNet: A National Research Network to Promote Sustainable Hydropower and Healthy Aquatic Ecosystems

2011· article· en· W2086073390 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Karen E. Smokorowski, Normand Bergeron, Daniel Boisclair, Keith D. Clarke, Steven J. Cooke, R. A. Cunjak, Jeff Dawson, Brett Eaton, Faye Hicks, Paul S. Higgins, Chris Katopodis, Michel Lapointe, Pierre Legendre, Michael Power, Robert G. Randall, Joseph B. Rasmussen, George A. Rose, Andre Saint‐Hilaire, Brent Sellars, Gary J. Swanson, Nicholas Winfield, Roger Wysocki, David Z. Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueFisheries · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsManitoba HydroMcGill UniversityEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Hydro (Canada)Institut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of LethbridgeUniversité de MontréalUniversity of New BrunswickNalcor Energy (Canada)University of AlbertaMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of WaterlooGovernment of CanadaCarleton University
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHydropowerAquatic ecosystemEnvironmental resource managementGovernment (linguistics)BusinessEcosystemSustainabilityProcess (computing)Environmental scienceEnvironmental planningEngineeringEcologyComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract NSERC's HydroNet is a collaborative national five-year research program initiated in 2010 involving academic, government, and industry partners. The overarching goal of HydroNet is to improve the understanding of the effects of hydropower operations on aquatic ecosystems, and to provide scientifically defensible and transparent tools to improve the decision-making process associated with hydropower operations. Multiple projects are imbedded under three themes: 1) Ecosystemic analysis of productive capacity offish habitats (PCFH) in rivers, 2) Mesoscale modelling of the productive capacity offish habitats in lakes and reservoirs, and 3) Predicting the entrainment risk of fish in hydropower reservoirs relative to power generation operations by combining behavioral ecology and hydraulic engineering. The knowledge generated by HydroNet is essential to balance the competing demands for limited water resources and to ensure that hydropower is sustainable, maintains healthy aquatic ecosystems and a vibrant Canadian economy. Resumen NSERC's HydroNet es un programa nacional colaborativo de investigación a cinco años que inició en el año 2010 e involucra a los sectores académico, gubernamental e industrial. El objetivo general de HydroNet es comprender los efectos que tienen las operaciones hidroeléctricas en los ecosistemas acuáticos y ofrecer herramientas científicas defendibles y transparentes tendientes a mejorar los procesos en la toma de decisiones que están asociados al uso de la energía hidroeléctrica. Diversos proyectos se encuentran insertos en tres grandes tópicos: 1) análisis ecosistémico de la capacidad productiva de los habitats para peces (CPHP) en ambientes fluviales, 2) Modelación de meso-escala de la capacidad productiva de los habitats para peces en lagos y embalses, y 3) predicción del riesgo de arrastre de peces hacia los embalses hidroeléctricos, en función del poder generador de las operaciones, combinando la ecología conductual y la ingeniería hidráulica. El conocimiento generado por HydroNet es fundamental para evaluar el balance entre la demanda por recursos hídricos limitados, para asegurar que la energía hidroeléctrica sea sustentable, que promueva la salud de los ecosistemas acuáticos así como también a la pujante economía canadiense.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFisheriesSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207