MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086083843 · doi:10.1029/2006gl028468

Direct polymerization of isoprene and <i>α</i>‐pinene on acidic aerosols

2007· article· en· W2086083843 on OpenAlexaff
John Liggio, Shao‐Meng Li, Jeffrey R. Brook, Cristian Mihele

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsoprenePineneAerosolPolymerizationPolymerChemistryMass spectrometryRelative humidityOrganic chemistryCopolymerChromatographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The direct polymerization of isoprene and α ‐pinene on acidic sulfate aerosols has been studied in a reaction chamber utilizing aerosol mass spectrometry. Results indicated that both species can be directly taken up into acidic aerosols to a significant extent, forming polymers that contain at least 4 isoprene or 2 α ‐pinene repeating units. Aerosol mass spectra indicate that double bonds in the polymers hydrate under acid catalysis, leading to partial oxygenation of the polymers. This reactive uptake depends highly upon relative humidity and particle acidity. This process is rapid and reaches equilibrium in less than 50 minutes, with effective partition coefficients ( K p , eff ) between 1.2–14.1 × 10 −6 m 3 μ g −1 , from which it is estimated &lt;0.5–5 ng m −3 of polymers may be present from both species in acidic aerosols. The formation of biogenic polymers is an important mechanism for incorporating hydrophobic, unsaturated species into polar aerosols and enhanced SOA formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations110
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207