Polarization of Prompt Gamma‐Ray Burst Emission: Evidence for Electromagnetically Dominated Outflow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Observations by the RHESSI satellite of the large polarization of the prompt γ-ray emission from γ-ray burst (GRB) 021206 imply that the magnetic field coherence scale is larger than the size of the visible emitting region, ~ R /Γ, where R is the radius of the flow and Γ is the associated Lorentz factor. Such fields cannot be generated in a causally disconnected, hydrodynamically dominated outflow. Electromagnetic models of GRBs, in which large-scale, dynamically dominant, magnetic fields are present in the outflow from the very beginning, provide a natural explanation of this large reported linear polarization. We derive the Stokes parameters of the synchrotron emission of a relativistically moving plasma with a given magnetic field configuration and calculate the pulse-averaged polarization fraction of the emission from a relativistically expanding shell carrying a global toroidal magnetic field. For viewing angles larger than 1/Γ, the observed patch of the emitting shell has an almost homogeneous magnetic field, producing a large fractional polarization (56% for a power-law energy distribution of relativistic particles, dn / d ∝ -3 ). The maximum polarization is smaller than the theoretical upper limit for a stationary plasma in a uniform magnetic field because of relativistic kinematic effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".