Plant 5S rDNA has multiple alternative nucleosome positions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In plants, 5S ribosomal DNA (5S rDNA) is typically found in hundreds of copies of tandemly arranged units. Nucleotide database searches revealed that the majority of 5S genes (>90%) have repeat lengths that are not simple multiples of a plant nucleosomal unit, ranging in plants from 175-185 bp. To get insight into the chromatin structure, we have determined positions of nucleosomes in the Nicotiana sylvestris and Nicotiana tomentosiformis 5S rDNA units with repeat lengths of about 430 and 645 bp, respectively. Mapping experiments carried out on isolated nucleo somal DNA revealed many (>50) micrococcal nuclease cleavage sites in each class of repeats. Permutation analysis and theoretical computer prediction showed multiple DNA bend sites, mostly located in the nontranscribed spacer region. The distance between bend sites, however, did not correspond to the average spacing of nucleosomes in 5S chromatin (approximately 180 bp). These data indicate that 5S rDNA does not have fixed nucleosomal positioning sites and that units can be wrapped in a number of alternative nucleosome frames. Consequently, accessibility of transcription factors to cognate motifs might vary across the tandem array, potentially influencing gene expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".