MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Host–pathogen interplay and the evolution of bacterial effectors

2007· review· en· W2086249877 on OpenAlexafffund
John Stavrinides, Honour C. McCann, David S. Guttman

Bibliographic record

VenueCellular Microbiology · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBiologyVirulencePathogenEffectorHost (biology)Evolutionary biologyPathogenicity islandGeneticsGeneCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many bacterial pathogens require a type III secretion system (T3SS) and suite of type III secreted effectors (T3SEs) to successfully colonize their hosts, extract nutrients and consequently cause disease. T3SEs, in particular, are key components of the bacterial arsenal, as they function directly inside the host to disrupt or suppress critical components of the defence network. The development of host defence and surveillance systems imposes intense selective pressures on these bacterial virulence factors, resulting in a host-pathogen co-evolutionary arms race. This arms race leaves its genetic signature in the pattern and structure of natural genetic variation found in T3SEs, thereby permitting us to infer the specific evolutionary processes and pressures driving these interactions. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge of T3SS-mediated host-pathogen co-evolution. We examine the evolution of the T3SS and the T3SEs that traverse it, in both plant and animal pathosystems, and discuss the processes that maintain these important pathogenicity determinants within pathogen populations. We go on to examine the possible origins of T3SEs, the mechanisms that give rise to new T3SEs and the processes that underlie their evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations128
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCellular MicrobiologySame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207