Longevity of deep ripping effects on Solonetzic and associated soils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The longevity of deep ripping effects on Solonetzic soils was investigated at 11 field sites in east-central Alberta after a period of 15 to 20 yr. Select soil properties and crop yield of deep-ripped and non-ripped control plots were analyzed. Dryland yield data of wheat, barley, oats and canola were assessed for 10 of the 11 sites over a 16-yr time period. Select soil properties were analyzed once in 1998 with penetration resistance (PR) evaluated again in 1999. A significant difference in penetration resistance was found between the deep ripped versus control treatments (P ≤ 0.05). There were no significant treatment differences for soil texture, bulk density (Db), pH, electrical conductivity (EC) or sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). A significant yield difference between the deep ripping and control treatments (for all crop species) was found for 6 of 10 sites (P ≤ 0.10), with all sites having an increase in mean yield for the majority of years evaluated. Generally, sites in the drier ecoregions had smaller yield increases than those in the wetter ones. Hence some beneficial effects from deep ripping remain for a long time period. Key words: Subsoiling, soil chemical properties, soil physical properties, crop yield, electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, bulk density
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".