Evidence that clozapine directly interacts on the GABAB receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurophysiological studies suggest that clozapine may facilitate γ-aminobutyric acid (GABAergic) neurotransmission. Therefore, we studied the interaction between clozapine and the GABAB receptor (GABABR). We showed that clozapine, and not N-desmethylclozapine, which is a metabolite of clozapine, increased the binding of the GABABR antagonist, [³H]-CGP54626A, at GABABRs. Linear regression analysis showed that the correlation between the dose of clozapine and the increase of [³H]-CGP54626A binding was significant. The curve of specific [³H]-CGP54626A binding in competition with different concentrations of GABA was left shifted in the presence of clozapine. With HEK293 cells overexpressing GABABR, we showed that clozapine had a significant increase of [³H]-CGP54626A binding at GABABR1 subunit, which provided a clue of the potential therapeutic target of clozapine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".