MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086286426 · doi:10.5539/ells.v3n2p9

Strategies for the Chinese Translation of The Widow’s Lament in Springtime in the Perspective of Comparative Poetics

2013· article· en· W2086286426 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Language and Literature Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersZhengzhou University of Light IndustryMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsPoeticsLamentPoetryLiteraturePerspective (graphical)Style (visual arts)HistoryArtPhilosophyVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the beginning of “American new-style poetry campaign” in the 1910s, Chinese ancient poems have exerted influence on American poetry. As the outcome of Sino-Western poetics communication, The Widow’s Lament in Springtime is a household poem. The poem has both Chinese and American poetic features. When translating this poem into Chinese, the translator should try his best to reproduce the Chinese and American characteristics. Negligence of either side will lead to the failure of the translation. It is in this sense that translation is a matter of poetics communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.013
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Language and Literature StudiesSame topicTranslation Studies and PracticesFrench-language works237,207