Influence of deposit stage and failed ESWT on the surgical results of arthroscopic treatment of calcifying tendonitis of the shoulder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is the evaluation of a possible influence of the preoperative deposit stage, the postoperative deposit elimination and failed preoperative extracorporeal shockwave therapy on the surgical outcome of arthroscopic treatment of tendinosis calcarea. From 1997 to 2004, 65 patients underwent arthroscopic resection of calcific deposits of the shoulder after failed conservative treatment. Patients with rotator cuff tears, major cartilage damage, or previous surgery were excluded. Out of 50 patients 45 (17 men, 28 women) that could be contacted with a mean age of 49 +/- 8 years could be followed-up with a mean of 36 months (14-89) after surgery. A total of 24 patients (53.3%) underwent preoperative extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT). For the clinical evaluation the Constant and Murley Score, the Simple Shoulder Test, the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) and visual analog scales for pain, function and satisfaction were used. For the radiological evaluation, the classifications according to Gaertner and Bosworth were used. Statistical analysis was done with the Wilcoxon test, the Mann-Whitney test and ANOVA. The Constant and Murley Score improved significantly from preoperative 63.5 +/- 11.4 to postoperative 93.9 +/- 9.9 points (P < .0001) at follow-up, the Simple Shoulder Test from 1.7 +/- 2 to 9.9 +/- 2.8 points (P < .0001), the WORC score from 1,591.2 +/- 337.4 to 345.4 +/- 392 points (P < .0001). The visual analog scales for pain, function and patient satisfaction also significantly improved (P < .0001). Preoperative radiological evaluation according to the Gaertner classification revealed 37 type I deposits, 6 type II and 2 type III deposits; postoperative no calcific deposits were seen in 37 patients, 6 type I and 2 type III deposits. According to the Bosworth classification 13 type I, 19 type II and 13 type III deposits were seen preoperatively. Postoperative X-rays showed 6 type I and 1 type II and III deposits. There was no significant correlation of the clinical results with the pre- or postoperative findings. The 24 patients who underwent ESWT before surgery did not show significantly better results than patients without ESWT. In conclusion, arthroscopic removal of calcific deposits of the shoulder shows good clinical results for pain reduction, shoulder function and patient satisfaction. The type of calcific deposit and the preoperative treatment of the shoulder with ESWT did not have any significant impact on the postoperative results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".