MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086430910 · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e318157393e

Hematogenous Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Spondylodiscitis

2007· article· en· W2086430910 on OpenAlexaff
Shafic Said Al-Nammari, Jonathan Lucas, Khai S. Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpondylodiscitisRetrospective cohort studyErythrocyte sedimentation rateSurgeryEpidural abscessMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusSepsisDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineStaphylococcus aureusAbscess

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To determine relevant demographics, clinical presentations, and outcomes of this condition. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: This is the first study looking specifically at methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) spondylodiscitis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients presenting between 2000 and 2005. RESULTS: Thirteen cases were identified. The mean age was 65 years; 85% were male. All cases presented with back pain, spinal tenderness, and systemic upset. Neurologic deficit was present initially in 39%, and 8% developed neurologic deterioration during treatment. The thoracic spine (53%) was most commonly affected, followed by the lumbar (33%), thoracolumbar junction (7%), and cervical spine (7%); 16% of cases were multilevel. The white cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were elevated in all cases with means of 17.3 x 10(-9)/L, 102 mm/h, and 236 mg/L, respectively. Radiologic diagnosis was established with MRI in all cases. The most common risk factors were diabetes mellitus (62%), malnourishment (54%), cirrhosis (31%), end-stage renal failure (15%), and intravenous drug use (15%). Multiple risk factors were present in 76% of cases, and only 15% had no identifiable risk factors. The main sources of sepsis were intravenous catheters (23%), urinary tract (15%), and intravenous drug use (15%). Treatment consisted of intravenous vancomycin monotherapy for a mean period of 4 weeks followed by oral combination or monotherapy antimicrobials for a mean period of 8 weeks. Operative intervention was required in 38% of cases. At 6 months, 54% of cases were clinically free of infection, 38% had died, and 8% required ongoing treatment. Neurologic deficit was present in 50% of survivors. At 1 year, 29% of survivors had MRSA bacteremia and spondylodiscitis recurrence. CONCLUSION: This is a devastating condition with high mortality and morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicInfectious Diseases and TuberculosisFrench-language works237,207