Priming of Alveolar Macrophages upon Instillation of Lipopolysaccharide in the Human Lung
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The airways are continuously exposed to respiratory pathogens, which may result in bacterial pneumonia, one of the most common infectious diseases and the leading cause of sepsis. Considering that recurrent exposure to microbial products can lead to tolerance of immune cells, and that this might contribute to the susceptibility to nosocomial infection, we investigated the effect of in vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS) instillation on the responsiveness of alveolar macrophages. In eight healthy humans, sterile saline was instilled into a lung segment by bronchoscope, followed by instillation of LPS into the contralateral lung; 6 hours later, a bilateral bronchoalveolar lavage was performed, and purified alveolar macrophages were ex vivo stimulated with LPS or lipoteichoic acid (LTA), triggering Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 and -2, respectively. In vivo LPS-exposed alveolar macrophages were primed, as reflected by increased ex vivo LPS- and LTA-induced IL-1 beta and IL-6 gene expression and production compared with in vivo saline-exposed alveolar macrophages. LPS instillation did not influence the surface expression of TLR4 or TLR2. Furthermore, LPS instillation did not impact on the expression of a number of extracellular and intracellular regulators of TLR signaling. However, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase remained phosphorylated in alveolar macrophages upon LPS instillation. The current data demonstrate that LPS instillation in the human lung primes alveolar macrophages for further stimulation with either LPS or LTA, possibly by sustained p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it