MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086492903 · doi:10.1021/jo800215w

Synthesis and Structure of Spirocyclic Tetraethers Derived from [1,1′-Binaphthalene]-2,2′-diol and Pentaerythritol

2008· article· en· W2086492903 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Tu, Thierry Maris, James D. Wuest

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPentaerythritolChemistryDiolCrystal engineeringStereochemistryMoleculeCrystal structureCrystallographyCombinatorial chemistrySupramolecular chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molecular scaffolds that have well-defined geometries, are easy to synthesize and functionalize, and can hold attached sites of molecular recognition in suitable orientations are useful tools in various areas of science and technology. The utility of the tetraphenyl ether of pentaerythritol (4) as a scaffold in crystal engineering led us to study rigidified analogue SBINOX (5), the spirocyclic tetraether derived from pentaerythritol and [1,1'-binaphthalene]-2,2'-diol (BINOL). We have found that SBINOX (5) and derivatives can be prepared conveniently in acceptable yields and in stereoisomerically pure (S,S), (R,S), and (R,R) forms. X-ray crystallographic studies have revealed that the benzannulated 9-membered dioxonane rings in these structures adopt characteristic conformations of C1 symmetry. Intraannular C-H...O interactions help maintain the conformations of the individual rings, and the geometry of the spirocyclic SBINOX core is also controlled in part by distinctive short interannular C-H...O and C-H...pi interactions. Despite the inherent flexibility of the dioxonane rings, derivatives of SBINOX (5) can be expected to orient peripheral substituents in preferred ways, making SBINOX a potentially useful scaffold for applications in drug discovery, crystal engineering, and other fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207