Phenomenological Kinetics of Isothermal Wet Air Oxidation: Operating Severity Factor and Recalcitrance Index
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present investigation, the kinetics governing wet air oxidation (WAO) of organic pollutants is modeled by two distinct parallel kinetic terms corresponding to a readily oxidizable and a recalcitrant structural parts of the pollutant molecule involving the concept of thermodynamic severity factor. The developed model was successfully applied to several classes of organic water pollutants including phenolic compounds as well as mono- and di-carboxylic acids. In the offshoot of the model, a recalcitrance index was proposed classifying the pollutant molecules according to their resistance to oxidation. For the carboxylic acids, it was found that the recalcitrance towards WAO was inversely correlated to the molecular size and weight. Acetic acid proved to be the more recalcitrant component. As for the phenolic compounds, the oxidation efficiency was shown to be affected by the nature of the substitutents present on the phenolic ring. The electron donating substitutents such as alkyl groups (CH3 or C2H5) confer to the molecule an enhanced reactivity towards WAO. On the contrary, electron-accepting substitutents, such as methoxy groups, lower the oxidation and consequently enhance the recalcitrance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".