MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086601795 · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02574-7

Overexpression of sTnC polypeptide in muscle cells is controlled by its rapid degradation

2002· article· en· W2086601795 on OpenAlexaff
Xingping Yin, Monideepa Choudhury, Jnanankur Bag

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfectionMessenger RNACell biologyBiologyMolecular biologyChemistryBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The check-points that maintain stoichiometric synthesis of muscle proteins were examined by misexpression of slow troponin C (sTnC) in mouse C2 myotubes. The sTnC mRNA was overexpressed in myotubes by transfecting these cells with a plasmid construct containing the constitutive CMV promoter-driven sTnC cDNA. An approximately four-fold increase of sTnC mRNA level in the transfected cells was observed. However, the increased mRNA level did not produce a corresponding increase of the sTnC polypeptide level in transfected cells. Only a modest 1.5-fold increase of the sTnC polypeptide level in the transfected cells was observed. The excess sTnC polypeptide in transfected cells was found in the soluble form which was not complexed with other thin filament proteins. The difference between the increase of sTnC mRNA and the polypeptide levels in transfected cells was not due to inefficient translation of the overexpressed sTnC mRNA. Analyses of the stability of the sTnC polypeptide in the thin filament and in the unassembled soluble forms showed that the excess soluble sTnC polypeptide was degraded more rapidly than the sTnC polypeptide of the thin filament. Analyses of the mRNA and polypeptide levels of several thin filament complements showed no effect of overexpression of the sTnC mRNA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207