MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086625727 · doi:10.1051/fruits/2013070

Diversity of fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species in French Guiana: their main host plants and associated parasitoids during the period 1994–2003 and prospects for management

2013· article· en· W2086625727 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐François Vayssières, J. P. Cayol, P. Caplong, Julien Séguret, David Midgarden, Aliès van Sauers-Muller, Roberto A. Zucchi, Keiko Uramoto, Aldo Malavasi

Bibliographic record

VenueFruits · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
FundersCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le DéveloppementCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsTephritidaeBiologyHost (biology)Period (music)ParasitoidDiversity (politics)EcologyBotanyPEST analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diversity of fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species in French Guiana: their main host plants with associated parasitoids during the period 1994-2003 and prospects for management. Abstract -Introduction.This study was carried out in French Guiana, over ten years (1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003) by three institutions (SPV, FDGPC and CIRAD); it updates the current state of knowledge of Tephritidae (both Dacini and Toxotrypanini tribes) species present in this country.Materials and methods.The work was mainly conducted in inhabited areas (from the Brazilian border to the Surinamese border) where cultivated fruit crops are located.Specimens were obtained by adult trapping and fruit sampling in nearby orchards and at the edge of the rainforest.Trapping was done consistently for 10 years, while fruit sampling was a discontinuous activity.We present only the results for fruit sampling from three consecutive years (2001)(2002)(2003) in which a total of 880 kg from 45 fruit species in 22 plant families were collected.Results.Twenty-nine plant species from fourteen plant families were found to be hosts of twenty-one Anastrepha species and one Bactrocera species, Bactrocera carambolae Drew and Hancock.During this period, no specimen of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) was collected in traps or fruit samples.We registered the main fruit trees which were hosts for B. carambolae and Anastrepha spp.Five hymenopterous parasitoid species were identified.Among them, Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) is an exotic species and was introduced into French Guiana in collaboration with Brazilian authorities (EMBRAPA) in 2000 and 2001 within the framework of a classical biological control program.Conclusion.Our data provide baseline information about the tephritid species of economic importance present in French Guiana and assist in developing potential future control programs of both the B. carambolae and Anastrepha species in the Amazon Basin.These preliminary results are discussed in the light of their implication for rainforest conservation efforts and also evolutionary relationships between fruit flies and their hosts.French Guiana / fruit trees / host plants / fruit-damaging insects / data collection / Tephritidae / Braconidae / Bactrocera carambolae / Anastrepha Diversité des espèces de mouches des fruits (Diptera : Tephritidae) présentes en Guyane française : leurs principales plantes-hôtes et leurs parasitoïdes durant la période 1994-2003, et perspectives de lutte. Résumé -Introduction.Cette étude s'est déroulée en Guyane française durant dix ans (1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003) grâce à trois institutions (SPV, FDGPC, CIRAD) ; elle apporte sa contribution à un inventaire des espèces de Tephritidae (Dacini and Toxotrypanini) dans ce pays.Matériel et méthodes.Cet inventaire concerne les zones habitées de la Guyane française de la frontière brésilienne à la frontière surinamienne et concerne les localités hébergeant des cultures fruitières.Les Tephritidae ont été obtenues par piégeage des adultes et échantillonnages de fruits autour des vergers et en bordure de la forêt pluviale.Le piégeage a duré globalement une dizaine d'année tandis que les échantillonnages de fruits ont été effectués de façon discontinue.Nous présentons les résultats de trois années consécutives ( 2001 à 2003) durant lesquelles un total de 880 kg de fruits, avec 45 essences fruitières représentant 22 familles, a été récolté.Résultats.Vingt neuf espèces fruitières appartenant à quatorze familles sont les hôtes de vingt et une espèces d'Anastrepha et d'une espèce de Bactrocera, Bactrocera carambolae Drew and Hancock.Durant cette période, aucun specimen de Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) n'a été capturé dans les pièges ou n'a émergé des récoltes de fruits.Nous présentons les principales espèces fruitières hôtes de B. carambolae et Anastrepha spp.Nous avons identifié cinq espèces d'hyménoptères parasitoïdes.Parmi elles, Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) est une espèce exotique qui a été introduite en Guyane française en 2000 et 2001 en collaboration avec les autorités brésiliennes (EMBRAPA), dans le cadre d'un programme de lutte biologique.Conclusion.Ces observations préliminaires peuvent apporter des informations basiques dans l'éventualité de la reprise des programmes de lutte contre B. carambolae et contre les principales espèces d'Anastrepha dans le bassin amazonien.Ces résultats sont discutés dans l'optique de leur valorisation pour la protection des forêts primaires, mais également de l'évolution des relations insectes-plantes.Guyane française / arbre fruitier / plante hôte / insecte déprédateur des fruits / collecte de données / Tephritidae / Braconidae / Bactrocera carambolae / Anastrepha

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFruitsSame topicInsect behavior and control techniquesFrench-language works237,207