Evaluation and Survey of Intravenous Vitamin K<sub>1</sub> for Treatment of Coagulopathy in Critically Ill Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine patient factors associated with coagulopathy, to assess variables affecting response to vitamin K1, to describe vitamin K1-associated adverse reactions, and to survey Canadian tertiary care hospitals about vitamin K1 practice patterns in their intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN: Retrospective chart audit and prospective survey. SETTING: Medical-surgical ICU with a 23-bed complement in a tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital, and 47 Canadian tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS: Forty-eight critically ill patients with nonconsumptive coagulopathies. INTERVENTION: Intravenous vitamin K1 utilization over 4 months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The only independent risk factor for elevated baseline international normalized ratios (INRs) was Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (r2 = 0.51, p<0.05). The INR values decreased after two doses of vitamin K1 10 mg for patients grouped as a whole (2.14 +/- 0.96 to 1.61 +/- 0.62, p<0.0001) and when patients were stratified according to APACHE II scores below 23 (1.83 +/- 0.44 to 1.34 +/- 0.18, p<0.05). The INRs were not significantly reduced for patients with APACHE II scores of 23 or greater (2.44 +/- 1.23 to 1.82 +/- 0.66). No variables were associated with response, and adverse events were not observed. Of 47 Canadian tertiary care hospitals surveyed, 27 (55%) responded. Twenty-four (89%) indicated that vitamin K1 was administered intravenously, and no adverse events resembling anaphylaxis were reported. CONCLUSION: Administration of two doses of intravenous vitamin K1 10 mg was associated with reversal of coagulopathies, but variable responses may be expected for patients with high APACHE II scores. Randomized, placebo-controlled studies are necessary to confirm the effectiveness of vitamin K1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".