Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor γ Regulates Angiotensin II–Stimulated Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in Blood Vessels In Vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Angiotensin (Ang) II is implicated in hypertension, vascular remodeling, and insulin resistance. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma activators increase insulin sensitivity and improve Ang II-induced vascular remodeling. We evaluated the effects of the PPAR-gamma activator rosiglitazone on Ang II signaling in aorta and mesenteric arteries. Rats received Ang II by subcutaneous infusion and/or rosiglitazone per os for 7 days. Blood pressure rise in Ang II-infused rats was attenuated by rosiglitazone. Ang II significantly increased Ang II type 1 receptor expression in the mesenteric arteries (P<0.001), whereas that of the aorta was decreased (P<0.05), changes which were reversed by rosiglitazone. Akt activity was increased by Ang II and returned to basal levels under rosiglitazone in both vascular beds. However, Ang II-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 activity increased in aorta but not in mesenteric vessels (P<0.001), where 4E-binding protein 1 activity was significantly increased by Ang II and inhibited by PPAR-gamma activation. In response to Ang II, Src homology (SH) 2-containing inositol phosphatase 2 activity was increased (P<0.05) in both vascular beds. In conclusion, PPAR-gamma activator rosiglitazone attenuated Ang II-induced blood pressure elevation and intracellular signaling on aorta and mesenteric vessels. There was differential inhibition of Ang II type 1 receptor receptors/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 in both vessels. Effects of PPAR-gamma activators on these pathways could contribute to regression of vascular remodeling in models of hypertension and diabetes and, accordingly, in hypertensive diabetic patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".