MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086734070 · doi:10.2514/2.5529

Incomplete Mixing and Off-Design Effects on Shock-Induced Combustion Ramjet Performance

2000· article· en· W2086734070 on OpenAlexaff
J. P. Sislian, Rudolph Dudebout, J. Schumacher, Md. Nur Islam, Tim Redford

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Propulsion and Power · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMach numberRamjetMechanicsCombustionScramjetShock (circulatory)Materials scienceAerospace engineeringThermodynamicsPhysicsCombustorEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A shock-induced combustion ramjet (“ shcramjet”) model is described to investigate the effects of incomplete fuel/air mixing and off-design e ight conditions on its performance characteristics. A fully implicit, fully coupled, Newton-iteration, lower ‐uppersymmetric Gauss ‐Seidel scheme is employed to solvethe Euler equationsat steady state. This scheme is coupled with a nonequilibrium chemistry model consisting of 33 reactions and 13 species. Axisymmetric and planar shcramjet e owe elds with variable equivalence ratio proe les representing extreme deviations from homogeneous fuel/air mixing are numerically solved for a range of e ight Mach numbers at a constant dynamic pressure of 1400 psf. Results show that incomplete fuel/air mixing gives rise to a combination of detonative combustion and simple shock-induced combustion. Comparison of overall performance characteristics to shcramjets with homogeneous, stoichiometric fuel/air mixtures demonstrates the degree of performance degradation. The propulsive characteristics of mixed-compression ramjets are calculated in off-design operating regimes corresponding to inlet Mach numbers above and below design Mach numbers of 12, 16, and 20; for externalcompression ramjets, the propulsive characteristics are calculated for inlet Mach numbers below design Mach numbers of 12, 16, and 20. It is found that the propulsive properties of the engines deteriorate when they are operated at off-design conditions. For mixed-compression ramjets operating at lower-than-design Mach numbers, the degradation in thrust production is due primarily to reduced heat release in the engine nozzle. At higher-thandesign Mach numbers, thrust production is reduced only slightly due to a modie ed nozzle geometry, required to ensure convergence of the numerical method. Generation of thrust for external-compression ramjets deteriorates at lower-than-design Mach numbers due to a high-pressure zone created in the combustor by the impingement of the detonation wave on the engine surface upstream of the design point. Mixed-compression ramjets are found to provide superior performance to external-compression ramjets at off-design operation. External-compression ramjetsarefound to bemoresensitiveto off-designoperation than mixed-compression ramjets.Itisconcludedthat the engine geometry must be varied as e ight conditions change if degradation in engine performance at off-design conditions is to be avoided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Propulsion and PowerSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207