MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086735403 · doi:10.1089/10445490050043335

Alternative Splicing of Xenopus α <sub>fast</sub> -Tropomyosin Pre-mRNA during Development: Identification of Determining Sequences

2000· article· en· W2086735403 on OpenAlex
Michelle Lesimple, Marie‐Rose Allo, Serge Hardy, Patrick Duriez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDNA and Cell Biology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyExonAlternative splicingMinigeneTropomyosinIntronXenopusRNA splicingMolecular biologyGeneticsGeneCell biologyActinRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Xenopus alphafast-tropomyosin gene contains in its central part a set of mutually exclusive exons, designated 6A and 6B, which are incorporated into mRNA encoding, respectively, nonmuscle and muscle tropomyosins. In this study, we show that usage of both exons is strictly regulated during development, exon 6A being used in the oocyte and nonmuscle tissues of the embryo, while exon 6B is used in muscle tissues. An approach of transient embryo transgenesis was developed to study the mechanisms involved in the splice site choice during development. We demonstrate that a-tropomyosin minigenes driven by tissue-specific promoters that target gene expression in nonmuscle and muscle tissues recapitulate the splicing pattern of the endogenous gene. A mutational analysis showed that regulation occurred at both exons 6A and 6B in muscle and nonmuscle tissues. In this context, we have identified an element located in the intron downstream of 6A that participates in the recognition of the weak 5' splice site of exon 6A and the repression of exon 6B in nonmuscle cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it