MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086742875 · doi:10.1086/376881

Floral Morphology in Caesalpinioid Legumes: Testing the Monophyly of the “<i>Umtiza</i> Clade”

2003· article· en· W2086742875 on OpenAlex
Patrick S. Herendeen, Gwilym P. Lewis, Anne Bruneau

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Plant Sciences · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyCaesalpinioideaeMonophylySynapomorphyBotanyPerianthSister groupCladeGenusCalyxPhylogenetic treeFabaceaePollen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The legume subfamily Caesalpinioideae forms a basal grade in the family, within which the subfamilies Mimosoideae and Papilionoideae are nested. Monophyletic groups within Caesalpinioideae include the tribes Cercideae, which is grouped sister to all remaining legumes, and Detarieae s.l., which is monophyletic only if the monospecific genus Umtiza is excluded. Umtiza is endemic to South Africa and has traditionally been included in the Detarieae, but its placement there has long been questioned. We present phylogenetic analyses of data from the chloroplast trnL intron and trnL‐F spacer and morphology that resulted in a single most parsimonious tree in which Umtiza is grouped with six other small caesalpinioid genera in an association of taxonomically and biogeographically disparate taxa. Umtiza, Gleditsia, and Gymnocladus form a clade that is sister to Ceratonia, Acrocarpus, Arcoa, and Tetrapterocarpon. Although these seven genera are dissimilar in many respects, they share several potential morphological synapomorphies, one of which is the presence of dioecy, which occurs in Gymnocladus, Gleditsia, Ceratonia, Arcoa, and Tetrapterocarpon. However, the occasional occurrence of apparently bisexual flowers in several of these genera complicates our understanding of the evolutionary history of sexual expression in these plants. Flowers in the Umtiza clade are small and green to white in color (green with a colorful hypanthium in Acrocarpus). Perianth structure has been of interest in this group, especially in Gleditsia and Gymnocladus, which have been portrayed as having a poorly differentiated calyx and corolla. This has been interpreted as evidence that they are among the most archaic members of the family. However, although the calyx and corolla are similarly colored, they are easily distinguished on the basis of size and texture. Thus, the characterization is inaccurate, and the evolutionary interpretation is unsupported. The greenish perianth and other unusual aspects of floral morphology observed in the Umtiza clade are clearly apomorphies and not plesiomorphic features for the family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it