Association Between Suicide Attempts and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult urology1 Apr 2006Association Between Suicide Attempts and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials D. Fergusson, S. Doucette, K.C. Glass, S. Shapiro, D. Healy, P. Hebert, and B. Hutton D. FergussonD. Fergusson More articles by this author , S. DoucetteS. Doucette More articles by this author , K.C. GlassK.C. Glass More articles by this author , S. ShapiroS. Shapiro More articles by this author , D. HealyD. Healy More articles by this author , P. HebertP. Hebert More articles by this author , and B. HuttonB. Hutton More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00885-2AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Association Between Suicide Attempts and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials." The Journal of Urology, 175(4), p. 1433 Ottawa Health Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada© 2006 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 175Issue 4April 2006Page: 1433 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2006 by American Urological AssociationMetricsAuthor Information D. Fergusson More articles by this author S. Doucette More articles by this author K.C. Glass More articles by this author S. Shapiro More articles by this author D. Healy More articles by this author P. Hebert More articles by this author B. Hutton More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".