MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2086788212 · doi:10.1186/cc13668

Outcome measures in randomized controlled trials of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review

2014· review· en· W2086788212 on OpenAlexaff
Gabrielle Lalonde, Michèle Shemilt, François Lauzier, Philippe Desjardins, Amélie Boutin, Laurence Moore, Dean Fergusson, Ryan Zarychanski, AF Turgeon

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTraumatic brain injuryRandomized controlled trialGold standard (test)Quality of life (healthcare)Glasgow Outcome ScaleIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyPsychiatrySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and long-term disability worldwide, and understanding its effect on health is critical. Although mortality has been a gold standard for years, functional scales and quality of life have been used as main outcome measures over the last decades due to their usefulness and aid in decision-making for medical teams, patients, and families. Despite this preference, no consensus exists for the most optimal outcome measure. We systematically reviewed outcome measures used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with severe TBI admitted to an acute care hospital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.073
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.073
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.010
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
DomainMethods
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical CareSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207