A Structural Model for the Osmosensor, Transporter, and Osmoregulator ProP of<i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transporter ProP of Escherichia coli, a member of the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), acts as an osmosensor and an osmoregulator in cells and after purification and reconstitution in proteoliposomes. H(+)-osmoprotectant symport via ProP is activated when medium osmolality is elevated with membrane impermeant osmolytes. The three-dimensional structure of ProP was modeled with the crystal structure of MFS member GlpT as a template. This GlpT structure represents the inward (or cytoplasm)-facing conformation predicted by the alternating access model for transport. LacZ-PhoA fusion analysis and site-directed fluorescence labeling substantiated the membrane topology and orientation predicted by this model and most hydropathy analyses. The model predicts the presence of a proton pathway within the N-terminal six-helix bundle of ProP (as opposed to the corresponding pathway found within the C-terminal helix bundle of its paralogue, LacY). Replacement of residues within the N-terminal helix bundle impaired the osmotic activation of ProP, providing the first indication that residues outside the C-terminal domain are involved in osmosensing. Some residues that were accessible from the periplasmic side, as predicted by the structural model, were more susceptible to covalent labeling in permeabilized membrane fractions than in intact bacteria. These residues may be accessible from the cytoplasmic side in structures not represented by our current model, or their limited exposure in vivo may reflect constraints on transporter structure that are related to its osmosensory mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".