MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Responses to Pharmacological Challenges and Experimental Pain in Patients With Chronic Whiplash-Associated Pain

2005· article· en· W2086809834 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dag Lemming, Jan S rensen, Thomas Graven‐Nielsen, Lars Arendt‐Nielsen

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Journal of Pain · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLidocaineAnesthesiaKetamineMorphinePlaceboWhiplashAnalgesicHypertonic salineVisual analogue scaleChronic painOpioidPhysical therapyInternal medicinePoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the analgesic responses to intravenous administration of morphine, lidocaine, and ketamine and their relations to duration of chronic pain after whiplash trauma. In addition, experimental muscle pain sensitivity and its correlation to pain duration and pharmacological responses were assessed. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with diagnosed whiplash-associated disorder grade II in the chronic stage, according to the Quebec classification, were included. The pharmacological evaluation was performed in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design and consisted of a 30-minute period of intravenous administration of morphine (0.3 mg/kg), lidocaine (5 mg/kg), ketamine (0.3 mg/kg), or placebo (isotonic saline). Intensity ratings of habitual pain on a visual analogue scale were taken before, during, and after the infusion. The patients were classified as nonresponders, placebo-responders, or responders (minimum 50% decrease of pain intensity) of the drugs. Pressure pain thresholds and intramuscular and cutaneous electrical stimulation pain thresholds were measured. The pain intensity during experimental muscle pain by intramuscular hypertonic saline was also recorded. Experimental pain assessments were performed on the lower legs outside the habitual painful area. RESULTS: Thirty patients completed the study; 2 were placebo responders and 10 were nonresponders. Of 18 responders, there were 15 morphine responders, 11 lidocaine responders, and 14 ketamine responders. In the patients with whiplash-associated disorder duration less than 2 years, 7 responded to morphine, 5 to lidocaine, and 8 to ketamine. In the patients with pain duration longer than 2 years, 8 responded to morphine, 6 to lidocaine, and 6 to ketamine. Thus, no pattern with respect to pain duration was found. Seventeen patients participated in the experimental pain assessment, and no significant differences in the variables of the intramuscular and cutaneous stimulation and intramuscular-induced pain with respect to response to the pharmacological challenges or whiplash-associated disorder duration existed. DISCUSSION: The pharmacological challenges identified subgroups of patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorder that might be considered before instituting therapeutic interventions or research. However, the pattern of responses to the pharmacological challenges did not show any clear relationships with pain duration or the experimental pain tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Journal of PainSame topicPediatric Pain Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207