Pericardial Effusions in Adolescent Girls With Anorexia Nervosa: Clinical Course and Risk Factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiac, biochemical and endocrine differences between female adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) with and without pericardial effusions. We studied 128 female adolescents (9.8–17.7 years) with anorexia nervosa (AN) diagnosed according to DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994 American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th, Washington, DC: Author. [Google Scholar]) criteria. They all underwent an echocardiographic evaluation. In 29 patients (22.2 %) a pericardial effusion (ranging between ≥ 0.35–2.5 cm) was noted. None of the patients were clinically symptomatic. After 3 months of refeeding, the effusions disappeared in 18/29 patients while in 7/29 patients a pericardial effusion > 0.3 cm persisted. Risk factors for development of effusions were a BMI ≤ 13,5 kg/m², weight loss ≥ 25% and IGF-1-level ≤100 ng/ml. Pericardial effusions are common in adolescent AN patients. They are mostly asymptomatic not requiring any intervention and spontaneously regress with refeeding. They are more common in the patients with the most significant weight loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".