Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in an advanced wastewater treatment plant. Part 1: Concentrations, patterns, and influence of treatment processes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Concentrations and patterns of the mono- through deca-substituted polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame retardants were determined in all major unit operations and processes within a tertiary-level wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) having post-filtration ultraviolet light disinfection. The results show that PBDEs do not appear to be degraded substantially or otherwise removed by wastewater treatment processes such as anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic biological treatment, anaerobic digestion, dissolved air flotation, or sand–anthracite filtration. An overall removal efficiency of 93% was observed for PBDEs in the WWTP due to sorption onto wastewater sludges, well below that predicted by equilibrium partitioning models. High levels observed in the resulting WWTP biosolids (~2.4 mg·kg –1 dry weight) may contaminate a wider environment through their use as a soil amendment. Lower concentrations of PBDEs contained within high volumes of aqueous WWTP effluent (~26 ng·L –1 ) may result in a large PBDE flux into receiving waters, posing a potential threat to drinking water supplies and fisheries resources. Key words: polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), flame retardants, municipal wastewater treatment, domestic sewage, mass balance, congener patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it