MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Damage Detection of FRP-Strengthened Concrete Structures Using Capacitance Measurements

2009· article· en· W2087044127 on OpenAlexaff
Amr A. Nassr, Wael El‐Dakhakhni

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Composites for Construction · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitanceMaterials scienceFibre-reinforced plasticFinite element methodComposite materialDielectricStructural engineeringPermittivityCapacitive sensingComputer scienceOptoelectronicsElectrodeEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a new concept for detecting air voids, water intrusion, and glue infiltration damages in fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs)-strengthened concrete structures was developed. The concept, based on detecting the local dielectric permittivity variations, was employed to design coplanar capacitance sensors (CCSs) to detect such defects. An analytical model was used to introduce the sensor operation theory and analyze the influence of different sensor parameters on the output signals and to optimize sensor design. Two dimensional finite element (FE) simulations were performed to assess the validity of the analytical results and to evaluate other sensor design-related parameters. To experimentally verify the FE model, dielectric properties of various materials involved in FRP-strengthened concrete systems were measured. In addition, two concrete specimens strengthened with FRP laminates and containing preinduced defects were constructed and inspected in a laboratory setting. Good agreement was found between experimental capacitance measurements and those predicated by the FE simulations. The proposed CCS design, coupled with commercially available portable capacitance meters, would facilitate field implementation of the proposed technique for rapid inspection of FRP-strengthened concrete structures without the need for sophisticated data analyses usually required by other more expensive and time consuming methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Composites for ConstructionSame topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207