Photochromism of salicylideneaniline (SA). How the photochromic transient is created: A theoretical approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theoretical ab initio studies of the singlet states of salicylideneaniline (SA) are presented. The enol, cis-keto and trans-keto tautomers were treated by the HF/6-31G* (geometries and force fields of the ground states), and the CIS (excited states), methods. For the dynamic calculations of the rates of proton transfer (PT) in S1 states, the instanton approach was applied. It was found that the SA molecule in S0 and S1 states of both tautomers needs nonplanarity to stabilize. In the ground state the corresponding angle was calculated as 44° vs the experimental value, 49°. Upon twist of the excited system, the conical intersection of (π,π*) and (n,π*) potential surfaces takes place. In enol form the absolute minimum on the S1 potential energy surface belongs to a strongly twisted (n,π*) state. In keto-form this minimum corresponds to a planar (π,π*) state, while the twisted (n,π*) has the energy ≈1055 cm−1 higher. The angles of distortion are equal 93° and 80°, for the enol and keto form, respectively. Both (n,π*) excited tautomers are practically unable to undergo the PT reaction. This, according to the calculations, goes via the planar unstable (π,π*) state. The calculated structures and force-fields lead to the (calculated) proton transfer rate of the order observed experimentally. The calculation of the transfer rate includes multimode nature of the transfer process. The PT cycle of the SA molecule involving the creation of photochromic transient has been proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".