Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p class="resume">L’auteur de l’article met en perspective la démarche intellectuelle et existentielle qui préside à la réflexion d’Y. Ledure. Il souligne d’abord que le projet de ce dernier est de « refonder le christianisme », c’est-à-dire d’asseoir le christianisme sur des bases qui ne soient plus métaphysiques, mais qui découlent résolument d’une anthropologie. Il montre ensuite qu’Y. Ledure opère une « déduction », au sens kantien du terme, de cette anthropologie, d’une part, à partir de la catégorie philosophique de la liberté entendue comme « détermination de soi », au sens que lui donne la philosophie des Lumières et, d’autre part, partir de la catégorie théologique de la « filiation ». C’est en opérant un croisement herméneutique de ces deux catégories qu’Y. Ledure entend aménager le socle anthropologique du christianisme. L’homme est un être capable de se déterminer comme fils de Dieu et un être capable d’entrer dans « la liberté (<em>libertas</em>) des enfants de Dieu ». À la différence de la métaphysique, le paradigme anthropologique n’est plus celui d’une vérité atemporelle, mais celui d’une liberté (<em>libertas</em>), dans et par laquelle s’atteste une vérité en devenir : celle qui rend l’homme libre.</p><p class="resume">The author brings into perspective the intellectual and existential approach informing Y. Ledure’s thought. He first underscores the latter’s project of “refounding Christianity”, that is to say, of laying the basis of Christianity on anthropological, and no longer metaphysical, foundations. He goes on to show that Y. Ledure “deduces” –in the Kantian sense of the word– this anthropology, on the one hand from the philosophical category of « freedom » understood as “self-determination” in the sense Enlightenment philosophy gives to it, and on the other hand from the theological category of “filiation”. It is through a hermeneutical combination of these two categories that Y. Ledure attempts to adjust the anthropological basis of Christianity. Man is a being capable of determining himself as son of God and of participating in “the freedom <em>(libertas)</em> of God’s children”. In contrast to metaphysics, the anthropological paradigm is no longer that of an a-temporal truth, but that of a freedom <em>(libertas)</em>, in which and through which a truth “in progress” becomes manifest : the truth that makes man free.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".