Single Center Comparison of Laparoscopic Cryoablation and CT-Guided Percutaneous Cryoablation for Renal Tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cryoablation has demonstrated therapeutic effectiveness for selected renal tumors. We compared our perioperative and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic (LAP) v percutaneous (PERC) renal cryoablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients (18 men/16 women) underwent a LAP and 26 patients (19 men/7 women) underwent a PERC procedure between September1998 and January 2007. LAP cryoablation was performed transperitoneally with ultrasonographic monitoring. PERC cryoablation was performed with CT guidance. Follow-up imaging was obtained at regular intervals. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 25 months. Average age (years) was 67.0 for the LAP and 69.7 for the PERC procedure (P = 0.307). Mean body mass index (kg/m(2)) was 29.8 for those undergoing LAP and 28.7 for those undergoing PERC procedures (P = 0.543). Mean tumor size (cm) was 2.9 for LAP patients and 3.1 for PERC patients (P = 0.432). Anterior tumors comprised 61.7% of LAP and 15.4% of PERC procedures (P < 0.001). Posterior tumors comprised 32.4% of LAP and 65.4% of PERC procedures (P = 0.01). Mean procedure time (minutes) was 165.7 for LAP and 106.6 for PERC procedures (P < 0.001). Hospital stay (days) was 2.6 for those undergoing LAP and 1.8 for those undergoing PERC procedures (P < 0.001). Both LAP patients (82.4%) and PERC patients (19.2%) needed postoperative narcotics (P < 0.001). Atelectasis developed in 70.6% of LAP patients and 34.6% of PERC patients (P = 0.005). Residual enhancement was seen in 11.5% of PERC patients and 2.9% of LAP patients (P = 0.192). Complications developed in 14.7% of LAP patients and 26.9% of PERC patients (P = 0.248). 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year disease-specific survival for the two groups was 100%. Tumor size > 4 cm and endophytic location were significantly associated with residual enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: LAP and PERC renal cryoablation have similar short-term outcomes. Significantly more anterior tumors were approached laparoscopically and significantly more posterior tumors were approached percutaneously. The PERC approach may offer advantages regarding hospital stay, narcotic need, and development of atelectasis. Longer-term data are needed to establish success of this approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".