MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087214908 · doi:10.1186/cc1213

Dose-response of arginine-vasopressin (AVP) on blood pressure (MAP), renal macro and micro cortical and medullary flowsin anesthetized rabbits

2001· article· en· W2087214908 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Albert, Losser Mr, Didier Payen

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasopressinMedicineArginineBlood pressurePentobarbitalMean arterial pressureMedullary cavityRenal medullaAnesthesiaKidneyInternal medicineCardiologyEndocrinologyHeart rateBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two linear curves for MAP, SVRen variations were observed (Fig. 1) with two different slopes (slope1 [doses from 1 to 25 ng AVP] = 0.17 & –0.12 and slope 2 [doses from 50 to 1000 ng AVP] = 0.01 & –0.02 respectively). EC50 (AVP dose inducing half of the response) was calculated from both curves: EC1 MAP = 9 ng; EC2 MAP = 662 ng; EC1 SVRen . = 13 ng; EC2 SVRen = 349 ng. The shift from curve 1 to curve 2 occurred at 40 ng for MAP and 68 ng for SVRen of AVP. For DVRen, Fl cort , Fl med no linear relation was observed at low AVP doses. For higher AVP doses, similar negative slopes have been calculated: DVRen –0.01; Fl cort –0.01; Fl med –0.003. MAP and SVRen react strongly to low AVP doses whereas DVRen Fl cort Fl med did not. At higher dose, Fl med is better preserved than DVRen and Fl cor .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical CareSame topicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207