Amphetamine stimulates Wnt3 increases in rat nucleus accumbens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dopaminergic neurotransmission is thought to be involved in reward-related incentive learning and addictive behaviour. Amphetamine will alter glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) activity by increasing dopamine transporter efflux rates. We investigated the hypothesis that Wnt signalling will be altered in rat nucleus accumbens within 15 min of injection of amphetamine compared with saline. We isolated RNA from the nucleus accumbens and used reverse transcriptase-PCR to screen for altered Wnt expression. We found that amphetamine had no effect on Wnt5a or Wnt7a expression but increased Wnt3. We then measured protein expression of Wnt3, phosphorylated lipoprotein-related peptide 6, GSK-3β phosphorylated at serine-9 and tyrosine-216 and total β-catenin. We found that amphetamine increased Wnt3 protein expression, increased pLRP6 (threonine-1572) levels, increased β-catenin levels, increased GSK-3β phosphorylation at serine-9, consistent with inhibition of GSK-3β activity, and diminished GSK-3β phosphorylation at tyrosine-216. Our data support the hypothesis that proximate Wnt signalling is rapidly activated by amphetamine in the adult rat nucleus accumbens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".