Efficacy and safety of <scp>OBI</scp>‐1, an antihaemophilic factor <scp>VIII</scp> (recombinant), porcine sequence, in subjects with acquired haemophilia A
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder caused by autoantibodies against human factor VIII (hFVIII). OBI-1 is an investigational, B-domain deleted, recombinant FVIII, porcine sequence, with low cross-reactivity to anti-hFVIII antibodies. Efficacy can be monitored with FVIII activity levels in addition to clinical assessments. This prospective, open label, phase 2/3 study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of OBI-1 treatment for bleeding episodes in subjects with AHA. After an initial dose of 200 U kg(-1) , OBI-1 was titrated to maintain target FVIII activity levels, in correlation with clinical assessments, throughout the treatment phase. All 28 subjects with AHA had a positive response to OBI-1 treatment 24 h after initiation despite inhibition of FVIII activity levels immediately after infusion in 10 subjects with baseline anti-porcine FVIII inhibitors. Control of the qualifying bleed was ultimately achieved in 24 of 28 subjects. No related serious adverse events, thrombotic events, allergic reactions or thrombocytopaenia occurred. The results of this study indicate that OBI-1 is safe and effective in treating bleeding episodes in subjects with AHA. The ability to safely and effectively titrate dosing based on FVIII activity levels in this study demonstrates that OBI-1 fulfils the unmet medical need to monitor the key coagulation parameter in AHA patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".