Stereoselective formation of a meso-diruthenium(ii,ii) complex and tuning the properties of its monoruthenium analogues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel bis(bidentate) ligand dgpm (dgpm = diguanidylpyrimidine) was synthesized by a catalyst-free C-N bond forming reaction in high yield (90%) by microwave-assisted heating. The ligand was coordinated to two [Ru(bpy)2](2+) cores to afford a meso-di-Ru(II,II) complex (1-meso) with high diastereoselectivity over its homochiral form. Three mononuclear ether-functionalized Ru(II) complexes (2: ethoxyether; 3: butoxyether; 4: 2-hydroxy-1-ethoxyether) were also isolated. The ligand and complexes were fully characterized by a variety of techniques including X-ray crystallography. In cyclic voltammetric studies, the complexes exhibit a Ru(III/II) couple, which is ~500 mV less positive than the Ru(III/II) couple in Ru(bpy)3(2+). The (1)MLCT absorption maxima of all the complexes (510-550 nm) are considerably red-shifted as compared to that of Ru(bpy)3(2+) (450 nm). The (3)MLCT emission maxima of complexes 1-meso and 3 are also red-shifted by about 120 nm compared to that of Ru(bpy)3(2+) (620 nm), whereas the corresponding maxima for complexes 2 and 4 are shifted by 75 nm and 25 nm, respectively. These relative trends in redox potentials and (1)MLCT maxima are in good agreement with DFT and TD-DFT calculations, performed for all complexes. Complexes 1-meso and 3 display emission from a Ru(II)-to-bpy (3)MLCT state, which is rarely the emitting state at λ > 700 nm in [Ru(bpy)2(N-N)](2+) complexes when the ancillary ligand is neutral.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".