Aging and cardiac responses to epinephrine in humans: role of neuronal uptake
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In healthy humans, ganglionic blockade unmasks a clear age-related decrease in cardiac responses to isoproterenol but not to epinephrine. We postulated that an age-related decrease in neuronal uptake (which affects epinephrine but not isoproterenol) may offset a parallel decrease in beta-receptor-mediated responses. To test this concept, nine young (mean 29 +/- 2 yr) and eight older (mean 61 +/- 2 yr) healthy subjects were infused on three different study mornings with epinephrine at increasing rates either alone or combined with desipramine to eliminate differences in neuronal uptake or with desipramine and trimetaphan to induce ganglionic blockade and thereby also eliminate differences in arterial baroreflex activity. Epinephrine caused the expected rate-related increases in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, ejection fraction, and cardiac index. Except for the systolic blood pressure, the extent of the changes was similar in young and older subjects. After desipramine, cardiac responsiveness to epinephrine was markedly enhanced, although more (P < 0.01) in young vs. older subjects for heart rate and cardiac index (+14 vs. 7 beats/min and +1.6 vs. 1.1 l.min(-1).m(-2), respectively, at 20 ng.kg(-1).min(-1)). Combined with desipramine and trimetaphan, cardiac responses to epinephrine were further enhanced, again more (P < 0.01) in young subjects, resulting in large differences in heart rate and ejection fraction increases (+29 vs. 17 beats/min and +14 vs. 7%, respectively, at 20 ng.kg(-1).min(-1)). Here, we show that "healthy aging" in humans is associated with decreased cardiac responsiveness to the beta-agonist epinephrine; however, this decrease can be balanced by concomitant decreases in buffering of these responses by neuronal uptake and the arterial baroreflex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".