MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087444534

Next Generation Sequencing in Differential Diagnosis of Childhood Melanoma From Spitz Nevus: A Case Report

2014· article· en· W2087444534 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xun Wu, Keith Tomaszewicz, Lloyd Hutchinson, Ediz F. Cosar, April Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Clinical Pediatrics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCDKN2APTENMelanomaMedicineComparative genomic hybridizationCopy-number variationDifferential diagnosisCancer researchSpitz nevusPathologyNevusGeneCancerBiologyInternal medicineGeneticsGenomePI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Melanomas are uncommon in children and share many of the characteristics of benign Spitz nevi in their clinical presentation as well as histopathology. Therefore, the diagnosis could be challenging. Currently, molecular diagnostic tools are being explored to aid the diagnosis in the pediatric melanoma. Melanomas often harbor multiple gene mutations and gene number variations, including BRAF (7q34), CCND1 (11q13), RREB1 (6p25), Cep 6, MYB (6q23), PIK3CA (3q26), PTEN (10q23), CDKN2A (9p21), c-KIT (4q12) and MYC (8q24), but these changes are rare in benign melanocytic nevi, including Spitz nevus of which the signature gene abnormalities had been recently revealed. Next generation sequencing (NGS) is a new molecular technique allowing the detection of a broad spectrum of genome abnormalities simultaneously, thus providing a potential powerful tool for assisting the diagnosis of childhood melanoma. We herein present a 12-year-old female with a melanocytic neoplasm showing histopathologic features highly suggestive of malignant melanoma. A variety of molecular analysis studies were employed including NGS, which revealed BRAF mutation, BRAF copy number addition, and CDKN2A and PTEN deletion. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies were also used, which not only confirmed the gene number variation in BRAF, CDKN2A and PTEN, but also revealed gain in MYC. These results added valuable information in the diagnosis of melanoma. This case demonstrated the usefulness of molecular analysis as the ancillary tools in assisting the diagnosis of childhood melanoma. Int J Clin Pediatr. 2014;3(1):22-28 doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.14740 / ijcp148e

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Clinical PediatricsSame topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207