MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087490411 · doi:10.1353/thr.0.0160

The Dog Speaks

2010· article· en· W2087490411 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Salcman

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œHopkins review/Hopkins review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyArtGray (unit)ExcusePoetryVisual artsLiteratureLawMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Dog Speaks Michael Salcman (bio) —Interior with Dog by Matisse, 1934 I'm only half-asleep so I know you're standing therewondering if I'm asleep. Nope.It's not easy to rest under this table—for one thing, there's a strong downward slopeand gravity's got me half tipped out of my basketlike an apple by Cézanne.Talk about a flat world!For another, I can't get away from these colors,the red floor tiles, orange table legand pink wall burning on my lids like the sun.Then again I'm never alone; the kids think a gray dog is cuteand I'm the only dog in the room. I was bribed(that's my excuse) with a boneand a bowl of fresh water. Really,I wish you wouldn't stare—it's extra hard to be an iconwhen you're not an odalisque and have no hair.Here's the inside dope, he wore a vest when he painted thembut saved his housecoat for me. I liked sitting for him,he was never rude and spared me his violin.I think I look very dignified, not naked, just nude. [End Page 210] Michael Salcman Michael Salcman is a physician, brain scientist, and art critic. He served as chairman of neurosurgery at the University of Maryland and as president of the Contemporary Museum in Baltimore. His recent poems have appeared in New Letters, The Ontario Review, Harvard Review, Raritan, and New York Quarterly. His two most recent books are Stones in Our Pockets (Parallel Press) and The Clock Made of Confetti (Orchises Press). Copyright © 2010 Johns Hopkins University Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œHopkins review/Hopkins reviewSame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207