MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087498839 · doi:10.1071/rdv21n1ab101

101 EFFECT OF DIETARY UREA ON EMBRYONIC VIABILITY AND DEVELOPMENT OF TOGGENBURG GOATS

2008· article· en· W2087498839 on OpenAlexaff
L. S. Amorim, C. A. A. Torres, E. A. M. Amorim, José Domingos Guimarães, J. F. da Fonseca, L. G. B. Siqueira, G.E. Seidel

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstrous cycleAnimal scienceUreaBiologyEmbryo qualityCorpus luteumEmbryoDry matterAndrologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineOocyteMedicineBiochemistryOvary

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urea supplementation in the diet of ruminants may alter the pH and protein concentration in different tissues and may affect the embryo quality and viability. Imbalances in nitrogen metabolism during the periods of oocyte growth and/or fertilization may dispose the zygote, pre-implantation embryo, and surviving conceptus to developmental errors. The aim of this research was to investigate the effect of feeding urea to goats on embryo quality. Eighteen Toggenburg goats, 48.6 ± 7.9 kg of BW, 2.9 ± 0.5 BCS, and 34.3 ± 20.8 months of age, were allocated randomly to 2 treatments: T1 (control, n = 8): no urea, and T2 (n = 10): 2.4% of dry matter (DM) as urea in the diet. The animals were fed diets based on Coast-cross hay (Cynodon dactylon) and concentrate (14% crude protein, DM basis) for 42 ± 2 days before embryo flushing. Estrus was synchronized with intravaginal sponges impregnated with 60 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (Progespon®, Syntex S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina) for 11 days plus i.m. injection of 100 µg of cloprostenol (Ciosin®, Schering-Plough, Cotia, Brazil), on the Day 9. The superovulation protocol consisted of i.m. injections of 200 mg equivalent of NIH-FSH-P-1 (Folltropin®, Bioniche, Athens, GA), in 6 decreasing doses at 12-h intervals, on Days 9, 10, and 11 (Day 0 = sponge insertion). Estrus was monitored twice a day for 30 min from sponge withdrawal by use of teaser bucks, and females were mated by fertile bucks every 12 h during standing estrus. Early luteal regression was preventing by administration of an antiluteolytic (Banamine®, Schering-Plough) 72 h after sponge withdrawal, 1.1 mg kg–1 per day i.m. for 3 days. Embryo recovery was done on the seventh day of estrous cycle by a transcervical technique. Recovered embryos were classified by quality (I = excellent, V = degenerated), development stage percent (1 = unfertilized oocytes, 9 = hatched blastocyst), and viability with the embryo grades 1 (excellent), 2 (good), and 3 (fair). The effect of urea supplementation on embryo stage and viability was analyzed by ANOVA. From the 18 goats, 12 (67%) were responsive to the superovulation protocol, 62.5% from T1 and 70.0% from T2. The number of embryos flushed (7.20 ± 2.39 v. 6.29 ± 2.93) and the percentage and number of viable embryos [100% (36/36) v. 100% (39/39)] from T1 and T2 were not different (P > 0.01). Thereafter, embryos in advanced stages of development (7, 8, and 9) were 58.65% from T2 compared with 0% from T1 (P < 0.01). In addition to the embryos, 13 unfertilized oocytes were recovered from the T2 goats v. none from the T1 goats (P < 0.01). These results suggest that urea may cause acceleration of embryo development and may affect oocyte fertilization. Supported by grants from CNPq, FAPEMIG, CAPES, Schering Plough®, Tecnopec®, and Carbogel®.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207