MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087547476 · doi:10.1117/12.467069

Multi-scale application of the N3 method for intensity correction of MR images

2002· article· en· W2087547476 on OpenAlexaff
Craig Jones, Erick B. Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionScale (ratio)HistogramComputer scienceNuclear magnetic resonanceAlgorithmPhysicsMaterials scienceOpticsArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatial inhomogeneity due to the radio-frequency coil in MR imaging can confound segmentation results. In 1994, Sled introduced the N3 technique, using histogram deconvolution, for reducing inhomogeneity. We found some scans whose steep inhomogeneity gradient was not fully eliminated by N3. We created a multi-scale application of N3 that further reduces this gradient, and validated it on MNI BrainWeb and actual MRI data. The algorithm was applied to proton density simulated BrainWeb scans (with known inhomogeneity) and 100 standard MRI scans. Intra-slice and inter-slice inhomogeneity measures were created to compare the technique with standard N3. The slope of the estimated bias versus the known bias of BrainWeb data was 1.0 (r=0.9844) for N3 and 1.04 (r=0.9828) for multi-scale N3. The bias field estimated by multi-scale N3 was within 1% root-mean-square of that of standard N3. Over 100 MS patient scans, the average intra-slice measure (0 meaning bias-free) was 0.0694 (uncorrected), 0.0530 (N3) and 0.0402 (multi-scale). The average inter-slice measure (1 meaning bias-free) was 0.9121 (uncorrected), 0.9367 (N3) and 0.9508 (multi-scale). The multi-scale N3 algorithm showed a greater inhomogeneity reduction than N3 in the small percentage of scans bearing a strong gradient, and results similar to N3 in the remaining scans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207