Assessment of epithelial integrity and cell viability in epithelial flaps prepared with the epi-LASIK procedure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the histological integrity and cell viability in epithelial flaps prepared with epikeratomes. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine and The Baptist Eye Clinic, Kyoto, Japan. METHODS: Epithelial flaps were prepared by epi-LASIK surgery. After immediate fixation, they were examined by light and electron microscopy. To assess cell viability in fresh epithelial flaps, biostaining experiments were performed using propidium iodide (PI), calcein-AM, and Hoechst 33342 dye. In addition, some epithelial flaps were organ-cultured for 24 hours. RESULTS: Light and electron microscopy showed that most of the inspected areas showed nuclei and cytoplasm at significantly reduced density and discontinuity of the basement membrane. Biostaining experiments showed that approximately 90% of the basal cells in epithelial flaps were PI-positive dead cells; organ cultures showed detachment of basal cells from the epithelial flap after 24 hours of incubation. CONCLUSION: Most basal cells in epithelial flaps prepared with different epikeratome devices were dead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".