MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087568287 · doi:10.1177/1077546311430104

On the methodology for evaluation of dynamic effects of a surface bonded piezoelectric patch for active vibration control

2012· article· en· W2087568287 on OpenAlexaff
Oleksandr Barannyk, Bradley J. Buckham, Peter Oshkai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibrationActuatorPiezoelectricityBeam (structure)Control theory (sociology)Transfer matrixActive vibration controlVibration controlSmart materialTransfer-matrix method (optics)Piezoelectric sensorMaterials scienceWork (physics)Normal modeVoltageAcousticsStructural engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current work presents a semi-analytic approach for calculating the influence of surface bonded piezoelectric (PZT) actuators on the free vibration of a flexible beam. A transfer matrix technique, originally developed for analyses of non-proportionally damped flexible beams, was modified to incorporate the PZT actuators' effect. Specifically, the technique's recursive calculations were significantly altered to account for the PZT actuators' tendency to couple the dynamics of node points of the flexible beam. Unlike many analyses of PZT laminated beams, the technique requires no assumptions of the revised modes' shapes, and the limits imposed by saturation voltages were incorporated. The methodology was applied to a vibration suppression application. A simple case of a single PZT patch employing angular velocity feedback was used to demonstrate and validate the calculation methodology. The sensitivities of the beam modes of vibration to the location and control gain of the PZT patch were summarized. The implementation for cases of linear velocity feedback and cases of multiple PZT patches employing mixed feedback laws were also outlined. The calculation methodology is very flexible and is of great utility in the optimization based design of smart structures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vibration and ControlSame topicAeroelasticity and Vibration ControlFrench-language works237,207