MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087572958 · doi:10.1016/s1055-3290(06)60399-3

Telephone Support for Canadian Nurses in HIV/AIDS Care

2000· article· en· W2087572958 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gail Tomblin Murphy, Moira Stewart, Judith A. Ritchie, Patty Weld Viscount, Andrew R. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAIDS VancouverDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacilitatorSocial supportBurnoutStressorNursingCoping (psychology)MedicineJob satisfactionHealth careHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PsychologyFamily medicineClinical psychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An assessment study was conducted with Canadian nurses (N = 177) in HIV/AIDS care to determine how social support influences the relationship between job stress and health (job satisfaction and burnout). The assessment study revealed that social support and coping both moderate the effects of these stressors on nurses' health and functioning outcomes (i.e., job satisfaction and burnout). Accordingly, the follow-up study tested the effectiveness of an intervention designed to enhance social support, promote the use of certain coping strategies for managing occupational stress, and prevent burnout in nurses. Telephone support groups, co-led by an expert facilitator and an expert AIDS nurse, were tested in a demonstration project for nurses in HIV/AIDS care (n = 30). The nurse participants reported that the intervention enhanced their coping, confidence, relationships, client care, and connections to the HIV/AIDS nursing community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS CareSame topicResilience and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207