Increased Efficiency of <i>γ</i> -Irradiated versus Mitomycin C-Treated Feeder Cells for the Expansion of Normal Human Cells in Long-Term Cultures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several normal human cells, such as hematopoietic stem cells, dendritic cells, and B cells, can be cultured in vitro in defined optimal conditions. Several ex vivo culture systems require the use of feeder cells to support the growth of target cells. In such systems, proliferation of feeder cells has to be stopped, so that they can be used as nonreplicating viable support cells. Because feeder cells need to provide one or few active signals, it is important to maintain them in an metabolically active state, allowing continued expression of specific ligands or cytokines. Mitomycin C and gamma-irradiation treatments are commonly used to prepare nonproliferating feeder cells and are usually considered to be equivalent. Normal human B lymphocytes can be expanded in vitro in the presence of feeder cells expressing the CD40 ligand CD154. Here we compared the ability of gamma-irradiation- and mitomycin C-treated feeder cells to support the expansion of normal human B lymphocytes. The results indicate that expansion of B cells during a long-term culture was 100 times more potent using gamma-irradiated feeder cells compared to mitomycin C-treated cells. This difference could be related to a significant reduction in both cellular metabolism and level of CD154 expression observed in mitomycin C-treated feeder cells, but not in gamma-irradiated cells nor in control untreated cells. These results indicate that mitomycin C-treated feeder cells are metabolically altered, and consequently less efficient at maintaining cell expansion in the long-term cell culture system used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".