Effect of water density on the absorption maximum of hydrated electrons in sub- and supercritical water up to 400 °C
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The optical absorption spectra of the hydrated electron (e(aq) (-)) in supercritical (heavy) water (SCW) are measured by electron pulse radiolysis techniques as a function of water density at three temperatures of 380, 390, and 400 degrees C, and over the density range of approximately 0.2-0.65 g/cm(3). In agreement with previous work, the position of the e(aq) (-) absorption maximum (E(A(max) )) is found to shift slightly to lower energies (spectral "redshift") with decreasing density. A comparison of the present E(A(max) )-density data with other measurements already reported in the literature in subcritical (350 degrees C) and supercritical (375 degrees C) water reveals that at a fixed pressure, E(A(max) ) decreases monotonically with increasing temperature in passing through the phase transition at t(c). By contrast, at constant density, E(A(max) ) exhibits a minimum as the water passes above the critical point into SCW. These behaviors are explained in terms of simple microscopic arguments based on the crucial role played by local density and configurational fluctuations (associated with criticality) in providing pre-existing polymeric clusters, which act as trapping sites for electrons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it