Hydrophobic Helical Hairpins: Design and Packing Interactions in Membrane Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helix-helix interactions within membranes are dominated by van der Waals packing motifs and side chain-side chain hydrogen bond formation, which act in tandem to determine the residues that comprise the interface between two given helices. To explore in a systematic manner the tertiary contacts between transmembrane helices, we have designed and expressed in Escherichia coli highly hydrophobic helix-loop-helix constructs of prototypic sequence K(1)KKKKKKFAIAIAIIAWAX(19)AIIAIAIAIKSPGSKIAIAIAIIAZ(44)AWAIIAIAIAFKKKKKKK(62), where "small" (Ala) and "large" (Ile) residues were used to maximize the tertiary contact area. Evidence that the two transmembrane (TM) segments in the AI construct contain an interface conducive for folding into a hairpin structure was obtained from the results that (i) the single TM AI(pep) peptide derived from the AI hairpin forms SDS-resistant dimers on PAGE gels and (ii) the corresponding sequence forms a strong dimer when examined in vivo in TOXCAT assays. Site-directed mutagenesis of AI hairpins was carried out to incorporate each of the 20 commonly occurring amino acids at X positions. Analysis on Western blots using an oligomerization assay in 12% NuPage-sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) indicated that mutants with X = E, D, Q, R, N, H, and K largely formed SDS-resistant dimers-which likely correspond to H-bonded four-helix bundles-while all the others (e.g., X = F, W, L, I, M, V, C, Y, A, T, S, G, and P) remained monomeric. Systematic studies of X/Z double mutants indicated that formation of hairpin dimers is the result of the disruption of stabilizing interactions between the antiparallel helices within the AI construct. The overall results suggest that, in situations where hydrophobic van der Waals packing energy between helices is sufficient to prevent significant rotation about the major axes of interacting helices, intrahairpin side chain-side chain H-bond formation will occur mainly when pairs of polar residues are interfacially located and proximal. Knowledge of the relative contributions of these forces should be of value, for example, in clarifying the context--and the structural consequences--of disease-related mutations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".