Optical and Photophysical Properties of Indolocarbazole Derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a study of the optical and photophysical properties of five ladder indolo[3,2-b]carbazoles, namely, M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5. The ground-state optimized structures were obtained by B3LYP/6-31G* density functional theory (DFT) calculations, whereas the optimization (relaxation) of the first singlet excited electronic state (S1) was performed using the restricted configuration interaction (singles) (RCIS/6-31G*) approach. The excitation to the S1 state does not cause important changes in the geometrical parameters of the compounds, as corroborated by the small Stokes shifts. The excitation and emission energies have been obtained by employing the time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT). For all the compounds, excitation to the S1 state is weakly allowed, whereas the S2 <-- S0 electronic transition of each oligomer possesses a much larger oscillator strength. The absorption and fluorescence spectra of the compounds have been recorded in chloroform. A reasonable agreement is obtained between TDDFT vertical transition energies and the (0,0) absorption and fluorescence bands. On one hand, the pattern of the aliphatic side chains does not affect the absorption and fluorescence maxima of the compounds. On the other hand, the replacement of aliphatic chains by phenyl or thiophene rings induces hypsochromic shifts in the absorption and fluorescence spectra. Finally, the fluorescence quantum yield and lifetime of the compounds in chloroform have been obtained. From these data, the radiative and nonradiative rate constants of the deactivation of the S1 state have been determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".