MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087669398 · doi:10.1107/s0907444902018838

S-SAD, Se-SAD and S/Se-SIRAS using Cu <i>K</i>α radiation: why wait for synchrotron time?

2002· article· en· W2087669398 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher T. Lemke, G. David Smith, P. Lynne Howell

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsSynchrotron radiationDerivative (finance)SubstructureSynchrotronAtom (system on chip)Yield (engineering)CrystallographyEscherichia coliWavelengthChemistryPhysicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceOpticsBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structure of Escherichia coli argininosuccinate synthetase (EAS) has been determined using S-SAD, Se-SAD and S/Se-SIRAS data measured with Cu Kalpha radiation. EAS contains 16 methionines and three cysteines in 455 amino acids. At a wavelength of 1.54 A (Cu Kalpha), the native (S-Met) and derivative (Se-Met) proteins yield anomalous signals of approximately 0.86 and 1.6%, respectively. Highly redundant data were measured to 2.0 A from native and derivative EAS crystals. All three structure determinations were carried out in a highly automated manner using SnB and SOLVE/RESOLVE. Despite the minute Bijvoet differences at 1.54 A, the signal was sufficient to determine the heavy-atom substructure and produce high-quality electron-density maps in all three cases. These maps were readily interpretable by the RESOLVE automated building algorithm, which modeled greater than 75% of all three structures. The success of these methods has profound implications for crystallographers experiencing difficulty with heavy-atom incorporation or with limited access to a synchrotron source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological CrystallographySame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207